Several approaches for a “structural change” emerge in the literature. The basis of the considerations are the theoretical considerations of Laloux (2015), who interprets “evolutionary” structures as sustainable. Anderson & Uhlig (2015) and Nowotny (2016) interpret the future viability of companies with “agile” structures. On the other hand, it can be argued that all of the authors mentioned are so-called “practitioners”, i.e. not academic sources. For this reason, an exact traceability of the results is difficult and the statements of the authors are controversial. Current literature contains numerous practical agile frameworks in “non-academic” sources such as Holocracy (or Holacracy) (Robertson 2015), Sociocracy / Management Y (Brandes et al. 2014), Democracy (Sattelberger et al. 2015), Scrum- Principle (Gloger & Margetich 2014) Agile leadership (Gloger & Rösner 2015), Management 3.0 (Appelo 2010) and “complexithodes” (Pfläging & Hermann 2015), on which the consideration should be focused. There are other agility frameworks such as SAFe (Leffingwell 2010), leSS (Larman & Vodde 2016) or Nexus (Schwaber 2015), but these have already been adequately investigated by empirical studies. All of the above frameworks provide a different approach to corporate agility.
Motivation of agility in management
In the course of the scientific literature research it was recognized that authors are taking up these practical approaches. Holocracy is described as a sustainable concept (Greenfield 2015), which should, however, be evaluated using scientific methods (Nair 2016). Sociocracy is also being studied by researchers. Current studies with knowledge workers of Generation Y can be found (Pant & Vijaya 2015). Democratic approaches have already been successfully evaluated in non-profit organizations (Edwards et al. 2015). The authors now recommend further research in organizations (Griffin et al. 2015). These are just some of the excerpts from the studies with the practitioners’ frameworks. For this reason, this article examines the agile frameworks and examines them with experts for their applicability and the fundamental necessity of agility in companies.
Study on agility in management
The study is divided into three sections. First, relevant literature on the framework of the “practitioners” is identified in the form of a literature search from academic databases, Google Scholar and a specialist book search using “search strings”. The research is limited to literature between 2010 and 2016. In exceptional cases, relevant older sources are also used in isolated cases. The literature is then divided into scientific and practical sources. The criterion for the practical sources is a high level of inclusion in scientific publications. The sources are then categorized and evaluated. This evaluation is carried out with the help of expert interviews. The aim of this evaluation is to assess the relevance of the literature for each company area (logistics, marketing, etc.) more precisely. In addition, the frameworks of the practitioners are scrutinized with the experts. The experts are preferably selected from small and medium-sized companies. For a common understanding of the conceptual background, the term agility is first defined in the context of organizations.
Safe download through virus scan
For absolute security, the whitepaper is regularly checked for harmful software. The project is funded by the Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology as part of the “IT Security in Business” task force. You can download it anytime without worry.
Tip: get the whitepaper too: Agile teams in waterfall organizations free!
Verwendete Quellen anzeigen
Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.
Bargstedt, U., Horn, G., & van Vegten, A. (2015). Strengthening resilience in organizations: preventing and coping with critical situations. Oberhaching: Publishing house for police science.
Brandes, U., Gemmer, P., Koschek, H., & Schältken, L. (2014). Management Y (vol. 53).
Diekmann, A. (2008). Empirical Social Research. Berlin: Rowohlt’s encyclopedia.
Edwards, A., de Kool, D., & van Ooijen, C. (2015). The information ecology of parliamentary monitoring websites: Pathways towards strengthening democracy. Information Polity, 20, 253-268.
Fettke, P. (2006). State-of-the-art of the state-of-the-art. An investigation of the research method “Review” within business informatics. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, 46 (5), 331-340.
Gloger, B., & Margetich, J. (2014). The scrum principle. Build and design agile organizations. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag.
Gloger, B., & Rösner, D. (2014). Self-organization needs leadership. Munich: Hanser Verlag.
Greenfield, R. (2015). The future is bossless. Bloomberg Business Week, 63.
Griffin, M., Learmonth, M., & Elliott, C. (2015). Non-domination, contestation and freedom: The contribution of Philip Pettit to learning and democracy in organizations. Management Learning, 46 (3), 317-336.
Hoffmann, GP (2016). Organizational resilience. Jumper.
Kaufmann, T. (2015). Business models in Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things: The path from claims to reality. Berlin: Springer Vieweg.
Laïfi, A., & Josserand, E. (2014). Legitimation in practice: A new digital publishing business model. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2343-2352.
Larman, C., & Vodde, B. (2016). Large-scale Scrum. Hallbergmoos: Pearson Education.
Leffingwell, D. (2010). Agile Software Requirements: Lean Requirements Practices for Teams, Programs, and the Enterprise. Boston: Addison Wesley.
Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., & Boland Jr., RJ (2016). Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Information Systems Journal, 26 (1), 47-75.
Nair, R. (2016). Holacracy in Academia. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, January, 1-2. Nowotny, V. (2016). AGILE COMPANIES – FOCUSED, FAST, FLEXIBLE: Just what
moves, can improve. Berlin: BusinessVillage.
Pant, JJ, & Vijaya, V. (2015). Management of Gen Y Employees through Psychological Contract – “An Exploratory Study in IT / ITES Companies”. SDMIMD Journal of Management, 6 (1), 25-40.
Pfläging, N. (2014). Organization for complexity. Munich: Redline Verlag.
Pfläging, N., & Hermann, S. (2015). Complexithodes: Clever ways to (re) enliven
Business and work in complexity. Munich: Redline Verlag.
Robertson, B. (2015). Holacracy: The New Management System for a Rapidly Changing
World. New York: Macmillan USA.
Sattelberger, T., Welpe, I., & Boes, A. (2015). The democratic company. Munich:
Haufe publishing house.
Schwaber, K. (2015). Nexus Framework. https://www.scrum.org/Resources/The-Nexus- Guide.
Image-Source Titlepicture: Fotolia.de 2016 – buyed License